Sustainable living and Solar power
Welcome
to Eco-living.com. Our site is designed to educate about sustainable
living practices and products and how political and economic conditions
may impact the future of sustainable living practices.
Eco-living.com is purely informational and does not promote or endorse
any particular product or method.
At the start of George W. Bush's presidential term the future of sustainable
living looked bleak. President Bush refused to sign the Kyoto treaty
which signaled the United States’ continued dependence upon carbon-based
fuels.
Toward the end of President Bush's term, however, a shift toward green
living occurred. Former Vice President Al Gore released a documentary
entitled An Inconvenient Truth. The movie focused on the dangers of
relying on carbon-based fuels and not moving toward practices of sustainable
living. The film won an Academy Award and that same year Al Gore shared
a Nobel peace prize for his efforts regarding environmental stewardship.
Public opinion seemed to be shifting, and more and more scientists acknowledged
the validity of the greenhouse effect. Even President Bush recanted
his policy and acknowledged the country would have to move toward sustainable
living practices. More and more businesses popped up that sold green
products, energy efficient products, and anything that could reduce
carbon footprints.
During the 2008 presidential campaign both presidential candidates offered
strong commitments to green products and alternative energy practices.
Unfortunately, just as a major shift in the winds seem to be steering
the United States toward sustainable living, a major economic turmoil
descended upon the stock markets that analysts now fear may make the
move toward sustainable living more difficult.
The backdrop to the economic crisis is a burst housing market bubble
based on bad loans that led to a massive number of foreclosures. Major
financial institutions ranging from national banks to investment banks
lost tremendous amounts of money which led to unwillingness to extend
credit. Banks refused to lend money to other financial institutions
and to businesses and consumers. A wave of fear struck Wall Street and
trillions of dollars in liquidity were lost in a matter of weeks.
Before this crisis politicians had been hoping to shift the United State
away from foreign oil toward energy independence by encouraging sustainable
living. (For example, both candidates strongly backed the use of solar
power and solar panels among other renewable energy sources.) Unfortunately,
analysts fear that these goals will now not be able to be met because
they require loans and capital that are no longer available because
of the Wall Street credit crisis.
For example, for a large company to shift from electric power to solar
power it needs to make an investment in solar panels. In the long run
the company will save money, but it will likely need to borrow money
to build the panels, and if banks are not willing to lend, then progress
toward green living will be slowed.
The same problems could occur in the consumer market because buyers
need low credit card rates and home equity loans to purchase green products
and residential solar products.
Environmental advocates and analysts hope that the federal government
will be able to ease fears on Wall Street and offer incentives for those
investing in sustainable living. Those factors combined with continued
increase prices in gas may move the United States' population toward
lower carbon footprints after President Bush is out of office. For environmentalists
that would be one of the best green gifts for the new year.